<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 362 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32153</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal without pre-deposit of duty. The issue revolved around the credit of service tax based on TR6 challan. The Tribunal relied on precedent, stating that credit cannot be denied if tax payment is not denied, and no specified document was required during the relevant period. The order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 362 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32153</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal without pre-deposit of duty. The issue revolved around the credit of service tax based on TR6 challan. The Tribunal relied on precedent, stating that credit cannot be denied if tax payment is not denied, and no specified document was required during the relevant period. The order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>