<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 702 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435316</link>
    <description>The classification of goods cleared from Kandla SEZ was required to be reconsidered in light of the director&#039;s affidavit, and the matter could not be finally decided without a fresh adjudication. The impugned orders were set aside and the dispute was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision after granting sufficient opportunity of personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 18:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 702 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435316</link>
      <description>The classification of goods cleared from Kandla SEZ was required to be reconsidered in light of the director&#039;s affidavit, and the matter could not be finally decided without a fresh adjudication. The impugned orders were set aside and the dispute was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision after granting sufficient opportunity of personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>