https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32145 The Tribunal held that the Commissioner exceeded the show cause notice's terms by confirming service tax demands under Business Auxiliary Services when the notice did not specify such grounds. The Tribunal granted a stay application, waiving the pre-deposit and staying demand recovery. It was emphasized that confirming demands under new grounds not mentioned in the notice was unjustified. The appeal was scheduled for further hearing, with the order to be pronounced in open court. en-us Thu, 22 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32145 The Tribunal held that the Commissioner exceeded the show cause notice's terms by confirming service tax demands under Business Auxiliary Services when the notice did not specify such grounds. The Tribunal granted a stay application, waiving the pre-deposit and staying demand recovery. It was emphasized that confirming demands under new grounds not mentioned in the notice was unjustified. The appeal was scheduled for further hearing, with the order to be pronounced in open court. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 22 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32145