<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 684 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435298</link>
    <description>A deposit condition requiring payment of Rs. 2 crores was found unsustainable because the matter was treated as identical to a previously decided case, and the Court followed the reasons recorded there. The monetary deposit requirement was therefore set aside, while the remaining conditions in the impugned order were left undisturbed and sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 12:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 684 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435298</link>
      <description>A deposit condition requiring payment of Rs. 2 crores was found unsustainable because the matter was treated as identical to a previously decided case, and the Court followed the reasons recorded there. The monetary deposit requirement was therefore set aside, while the remaining conditions in the impugned order were left undisturbed and sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>