https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307086 Section 482 inherent power cannot be invoked to bypass the Code's specific revisional remedy where a discharge order is not interlocutory and is amenable to scrutiny under Sections 397/401. A stranger to the criminal proceedings, who was neither a victim nor otherwise shown to be an aggrieved person, had no independent right to challenge the discharge order merely as a concerned citizen. The fact that the aggrieved person had already filed and voluntarily withdrawn a revision, after the Court satisfied itself that the withdrawal was not under pressure or coercion, reinforced the absence of maintainability. No exceptional abuse of process was shown to justify inherent jurisdiction. en-us Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Mar 2023 21:19:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307086 Section 482 inherent power cannot be invoked to bypass the Code's specific revisional remedy where a discharge order is not interlocutory and is amenable to scrutiny under Sections 397/401. A stranger to the criminal proceedings, who was neither a victim nor otherwise shown to be an aggrieved person, had no independent right to challenge the discharge order merely as a concerned citizen. The fact that the aggrieved person had already filed and voluntarily withdrawn a revision, after the Court satisfied itself that the withdrawal was not under pressure or coercion, reinforced the absence of maintainability. No exceptional abuse of process was shown to justify inherent jurisdiction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307086