<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1613 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307088</link>
    <description>The court ruled against the revenue and in favor of the assessee, holding that the unpaid VAT should not be disallowed as a deduction since it was not claimed in the Books of Accounts. The court emphasized the importance of the accounting system chosen by the assessee and concluded that Section 43-B of the Income Tax Act did not need to be relied upon for claiming deductions due to the favorable accounting system adopted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 21:19:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1613 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307088</link>
      <description>The court ruled against the revenue and in favor of the assessee, holding that the unpaid VAT should not be disallowed as a deduction since it was not claimed in the Books of Accounts. The court emphasized the importance of the accounting system chosen by the assessee and concluded that Section 43-B of the Income Tax Act did not need to be relied upon for claiming deductions due to the favorable accounting system adopted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>