<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (11) TMI 295 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307073</link>
    <description>A third party claiming only a family or derivative interest in property has no locus standi to invoke the High Court&#039;s inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to challenge proceedings under Sections 82 and 83. The inherent and revisional powers are intended to prevent abuse of process and redress legal injury to a person aggrieved; ordinarily, the accused or directly affected person must challenge the proceedings. The liberal standing recognised in public interest litigation is confined to genuine public wrongs and does not permit a stranger to contest proceedings affecting another person. Mere assertion of interest, without invasion of a legally protected right, is insufficient.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 16:15:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (11) TMI 295 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307073</link>
      <description>A third party claiming only a family or derivative interest in property has no locus standi to invoke the High Court&#039;s inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to challenge proceedings under Sections 82 and 83. The inherent and revisional powers are intended to prevent abuse of process and redress legal injury to a person aggrieved; ordinarily, the accused or directly affected person must challenge the proceedings. The liberal standing recognised in public interest litigation is confined to genuine public wrongs and does not permit a stranger to contest proceedings affecting another person. Mere assertion of interest, without invasion of a legally protected right, is insufficient.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>