<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 678 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435292</link>
    <description>HC ruled that tax authorities improperly attached petitioner&#039;s bank account without valid jurisdiction. The court suspended the attachment order, directing the petitioner to deposit the transferred sum in court registry. Respondent was instructed to provide justification for the attachment and submit relevant documents for judicial review, with further proceedings scheduled for a specified date in 2023.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 678 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435292</link>
      <description>HC ruled that tax authorities improperly attached petitioner&#039;s bank account without valid jurisdiction. The court suspended the attachment order, directing the petitioner to deposit the transferred sum in court registry. Respondent was instructed to provide justification for the attachment and submit relevant documents for judicial review, with further proceedings scheduled for a specified date in 2023.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>