<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 669 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435283</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 2 crores to the assessee&#039;s total income. The Tribunal emphasized that the addition based solely on a statement made during a survey, which was later retracted, lacked credible evidence. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, supporting the deletion to prevent double taxation and affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s reasoning.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 08:40:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 669 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435283</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 2 crores to the assessee&#039;s total income. The Tribunal emphasized that the addition based solely on a statement made during a survey, which was later retracted, lacked credible evidence. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, supporting the deletion to prevent double taxation and affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s reasoning.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>