<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 649 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435263</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeals and affirming that the composite Resolution Plan violated the terms of the Lease Deed and was not permissible under the IBC. The Tribunal emphasized the need for compliance with legal provisions and protection of stakeholders&#039; interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 08:39:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 649 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435263</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeals and affirming that the composite Resolution Plan violated the terms of the Lease Deed and was not permissible under the IBC. The Tribunal emphasized the need for compliance with legal provisions and protection of stakeholders&#039; interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>