<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1509 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307056</link>
    <description>Receipts from access to an online education platform and course content were examined for possible treatment as royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act and Article 12(3) of the India-Malaysia DTAA, or as business receipts not taxable in India absent a permanent establishment. The Tribunal noted that the governing agreement and other material were not fully available before the lower authorities, so the nature of any rights granted to the Indian customer could not be conclusively determined. It therefore required fresh examination of whether the payment was only for access to information or involved use of, or the right to use, copyright. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2023 21:07:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1509 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307056</link>
      <description>Receipts from access to an online education platform and course content were examined for possible treatment as royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act and Article 12(3) of the India-Malaysia DTAA, or as business receipts not taxable in India absent a permanent establishment. The Tribunal noted that the governing agreement and other material were not fully available before the lower authorities, so the nature of any rights granted to the Indian customer could not be conclusively determined. It therefore required fresh examination of whether the payment was only for access to information or involved use of, or the right to use, copyright. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>