<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 1101 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307052</link>
    <description>On unchanged facts, the Tribunal followed the assessee&#039;s earlier years&#039; ruling and upheld a fixed place permanent establishment in India, noting frequent employee visits, supervision over Indian operations, and a place of business at the subsidiary&#039;s disposal. It rejected the Revenue&#039;s case on a service permanent establishment and a dependent agent permanent establishment because no treaty conditions were shown: the subsidiary had no authority to conclude contracts and functioned independently. Telecom link charges were held not taxable as royalty, since they represented connectivity services without transfer of the right to use equipment or process. Profit attribution was remitted for fresh recomputation in line with the earlier methodology.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2023 21:07:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 1101 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307052</link>
      <description>On unchanged facts, the Tribunal followed the assessee&#039;s earlier years&#039; ruling and upheld a fixed place permanent establishment in India, noting frequent employee visits, supervision over Indian operations, and a place of business at the subsidiary&#039;s disposal. It rejected the Revenue&#039;s case on a service permanent establishment and a dependent agent permanent establishment because no treaty conditions were shown: the subsidiary had no authority to conclude contracts and functioned independently. Telecom link charges were held not taxable as royalty, since they represented connectivity services without transfer of the right to use equipment or process. Profit attribution was remitted for fresh recomputation in line with the earlier methodology.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>