<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1373 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307063</link>
    <description>In proceedings on a police closure report, only the informant or complainant, an injured person, a recognised victim, or another person otherwise entitled in law may be heard. An investigating agency that is neither the complainant nor the victim cannot intervene or file a protest petition without statutory authority or supervisory jurisdiction over the other agency. The Bombay HC therefore treated the Enforcement Directorate as lacking locus standi to oppose the closure report before the Magistrate, and its protest petition was not maintainable. Authorities cited for intervention rights were found distinguishable or inapplicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 16:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1373 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307063</link>
      <description>In proceedings on a police closure report, only the informant or complainant, an injured person, a recognised victim, or another person otherwise entitled in law may be heard. An investigating agency that is neither the complainant nor the victim cannot intervene or file a protest petition without statutory authority or supervisory jurisdiction over the other agency. The Bombay HC therefore treated the Enforcement Directorate as lacking locus standi to oppose the closure report before the Magistrate, and its protest petition was not maintainable. Authorities cited for intervention rights were found distinguishable or inapplicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>