<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 624 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435238</link>
    <description>HC ruled the tax notice challenging input tax credit was premature. The court directed the tax authority to evaluate the petitioner&#039;s reply on merits, follow due legal procedures, and either drop proceedings if the reply is acceptable or proceed legally. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, emphasizing procedural fairness in tax dispute resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 624 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435238</link>
      <description>HC ruled the tax notice challenging input tax credit was premature. The court directed the tax authority to evaluate the petitioner&#039;s reply on merits, follow due legal procedures, and either drop proceedings if the reply is acceptable or proceed legally. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, emphasizing procedural fairness in tax dispute resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>