https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435235 The court determined that the applicant's tenure as a Member of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal should be extended until the age of 62, in accordance with the provisions existing before the 2017 Rules. The rejection of her candidature based on procedural grounds was deemed invalid, and her appointment was considered part of the selection process initiated in 2013, predating the 2017 Rules. The court's decision was based on interpretations of relevant rules and previous judgments emphasizing appointments made before the enactment of certain statutes. en-us Fri, 03 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Jun 2026 18:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435235 The court determined that the applicant's tenure as a Member of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal should be extended until the age of 62, in accordance with the provisions existing before the 2017 Rules. The rejection of her candidature based on procedural grounds was deemed invalid, and her appointment was considered part of the selection process initiated in 2013, predating the 2017 Rules. The court's decision was based on interpretations of relevant rules and previous judgments emphasizing appointments made before the enactment of certain statutes. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 03 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435235