<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 611 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435225</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee adequately explained the source of cash deposits through documented evidence, including income tax returns and financial statements. Emphasizing that income from earlier years cannot be taxed again to prevent double taxation, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, overturning the AO&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 611 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435225</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee adequately explained the source of cash deposits through documented evidence, including income tax returns and financial statements. Emphasizing that income from earlier years cannot be taxed again to prevent double taxation, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, overturning the AO&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>