<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 605 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435219</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the ex-parte assessment u/s 144 of the Income Tax Act, adding a significant amount to the assessee&#039;s income. The ld. CIT(Appeals) affirmed the decision, and despite the assessee&#039;s claim of delayed knowledge of the order, the Tribunal refused to condone the delay in filing the appeal, deeming the assessee&#039;s explanation insufficient. As a result, the appeal was dismissed as time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2023 08:26:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 605 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435219</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the ex-parte assessment u/s 144 of the Income Tax Act, adding a significant amount to the assessee&#039;s income. The ld. CIT(Appeals) affirmed the decision, and despite the assessee&#039;s claim of delayed knowledge of the order, the Tribunal refused to condone the delay in filing the appeal, deeming the assessee&#039;s explanation insufficient. As a result, the appeal was dismissed as time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>