<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 590 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435204</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order and revived the application to be heard and decided on its merits by the Adjudicating Authority. The Resolution Professional&#039;s role was deemed administrative, lacking adjudicatory jurisdiction. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the Adjudicating Authority to address pending applications before finalizing the resolution plan approval.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2023 08:25:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 590 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435204</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order and revived the application to be heard and decided on its merits by the Adjudicating Authority. The Resolution Professional&#039;s role was deemed administrative, lacking adjudicatory jurisdiction. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the Adjudicating Authority to address pending applications before finalizing the resolution plan approval.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>