https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32124 The case involved allegations of double clearance of goods under the same invoices leading to duty demands. The Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the duty demand based on minor discrepancies in invoices, citing lack of evidence for clandestine clearance. The demand of Rs. 20,000/- based on a consignment note was upheld. The Appellate Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner's decision, emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence for the allegations. The penalties imposed were adjusted, and the final order confirmed the Rs. 20,000/- demand, concluding the matter on 10-7-2008. en-us Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32124 The case involved allegations of double clearance of goods under the same invoices leading to duty demands. The Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the duty demand based on minor discrepancies in invoices, citing lack of evidence for clandestine clearance. The demand of Rs. 20,000/- based on a consignment note was upheld. The Appellate Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner's decision, emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence for the allegations. The penalties imposed were adjusted, and the final order confirmed the Rs. 20,000/- demand, concluding the matter on 10-7-2008. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32124