<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 578 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435192</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and restoring the original order. The appellant was found eligible for the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, as there was no mis-declaration in the declaration under the scheme, and no pending inquiry existed against the appellant at the time of filing. The Tribunal relied on a judgment of the Bombay High Court in a similar case to support this decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 578 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435192</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and restoring the original order. The appellant was found eligible for the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, as there was no mis-declaration in the declaration under the scheme, and no pending inquiry existed against the appellant at the time of filing. The Tribunal relied on a judgment of the Bombay High Court in a similar case to support this decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>