https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435187 The Tribunal remanded the case for fresh adjudication due to discrepancies in the analysis of documents, incorrect computation of figures, and penalty imposition. The Commissioner was directed to re-quantify the penalty amount and adjust outstanding amounts based on the correct sales value. Errors in duty calculation for specific years were highlighted, emphasizing the need for accurate computation and adherence to the Tribunal's directives. The appeal was allowed for remand, stressing the importance of correct quantification of duty and penalty in accordance with the Tribunal's instructions. en-us Tue, 14 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Mar 2023 08:24:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435187 The Tribunal remanded the case for fresh adjudication due to discrepancies in the analysis of documents, incorrect computation of figures, and penalty imposition. The Commissioner was directed to re-quantify the penalty amount and adjust outstanding amounts based on the correct sales value. Errors in duty calculation for specific years were highlighted, emphasizing the need for accurate computation and adherence to the Tribunal's directives. The appeal was allowed for remand, stressing the importance of correct quantification of duty and penalty in accordance with the Tribunal's instructions. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 14 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435187