https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307039 Bail was granted after the Court considered the nature of the allegations, the applicant's prior resignation before the FIR, the absence of clear particulars about the alleged deposit period, the long incarceration, and the filing of the charge-sheet. The Court also noted that a similarly placed co-accused had already been released on bail and that the prosecution did not dispute that parity. Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the Court found the case fit for bail, subject to personal bond, sureties and stated conditions. en-us Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Mar 2023 21:44:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307039 Bail was granted after the Court considered the nature of the allegations, the applicant's prior resignation before the FIR, the absence of clear particulars about the alleged deposit period, the long incarceration, and the filing of the charge-sheet. The Court also noted that a similarly placed co-accused had already been released on bail and that the prosecution did not dispute that parity. Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the Court found the case fit for bail, subject to personal bond, sureties and stated conditions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307039