<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1385 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307046</link>
    <description>The court scheduled a hearing and disposal of the case for January 4, 2023. The advocates representing the petitioners, Revenue, and the State presented their arguments, with the State seeking an adjournment to obtain further instructions. The judgment highlighted the key contentions regarding the conversion of leasehold to ownership, the alleged connection to a previous case, and the consideration of income tax dues in the decision-making process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 21:44:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1385 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307046</link>
      <description>The court scheduled a hearing and disposal of the case for January 4, 2023. The advocates representing the petitioners, Revenue, and the State presented their arguments, with the State seeking an adjournment to obtain further instructions. The judgment highlighted the key contentions regarding the conversion of leasehold to ownership, the alleged connection to a previous case, and the consideration of income tax dues in the decision-making process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>