<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 557 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435171</link>
    <description>A treaty-linked arbitration settlement receipt was treated as taxable in India because it arose from project execution through the assessee&#039;s project office, establishing a real and not remote connection with the permanent establishment and bringing the amount within the provision on income effectively connected with that establishment. The claim for set-off of brought forward business losses was also accepted because the losses were substantiated on record, appellate directions required verification and allowance, and the omission to reflect the claim in the return did not justify denial of an otherwise legally allowable set-off. The settlement receipt remained taxable, while relief was granted on loss set-off.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 08:59:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 557 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435171</link>
      <description>A treaty-linked arbitration settlement receipt was treated as taxable in India because it arose from project execution through the assessee&#039;s project office, establishing a real and not remote connection with the permanent establishment and bringing the amount within the provision on income effectively connected with that establishment. The claim for set-off of brought forward business losses was also accepted because the losses were substantiated on record, appellate directions required verification and allowance, and the omission to reflect the claim in the return did not justify denial of an otherwise legally allowable set-off. The settlement receipt remained taxable, while relief was granted on loss set-off.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>