<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 531 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435145</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the order rejecting the application for payment of the dishonoured cheque amount, directing the Magistrate to reconsider the case in light of the settlement between the parties. The proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were to be reviewed to ensure justice and adherence to the settlement terms. The revision petition was disposed of without costs, and all related applications were also resolved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 08:57:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 531 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435145</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the order rejecting the application for payment of the dishonoured cheque amount, directing the Magistrate to reconsider the case in light of the settlement between the parties. The proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were to be reviewed to ensure justice and adherence to the settlement terms. The revision petition was disposed of without costs, and all related applications were also resolved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>