<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 41 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32097</link>
    <description>Income from a composite supply and services contract may be deemed to accrue or arise in India where a non-resident carries on substantial contractual operations through a business connection in India. The analysis applied section 9(1)(i) to attribute profits only to operations performed in India, while treaty relief was examined to limit chargeability accordingly. A permanent establishment was also found under Article 5 because the country manager acted as a dependent agent and the business was partly conducted from a fixed place in India. The treaty consequently permitted taxation only of profits attributable to the Indian operations and the permanent establishment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 41 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32097</link>
      <description>Income from a composite supply and services contract may be deemed to accrue or arise in India where a non-resident carries on substantial contractual operations through a business connection in India. The analysis applied section 9(1)(i) to attribute profits only to operations performed in India, while treaty relief was examined to limit chargeability accordingly. A permanent establishment was also found under Article 5 because the country manager acted as a dependent agent and the business was partly conducted from a fixed place in India. The treaty consequently permitted taxation only of profits attributable to the Indian operations and the permanent establishment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>