<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 460 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435074</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 7.20 crore under Section 68 of the I.T. Act, as the assessee had proven the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions. The Tribunal did not address the validity of the assessment reopening, deeming it academic after upholding the deletion of the addition. The appeal of the Revenue and the cross-objection by the assessee were both dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2023 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 460 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435074</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 7.20 crore under Section 68 of the I.T. Act, as the assessee had proven the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions. The Tribunal did not address the validity of the assessment reopening, deeming it academic after upholding the deletion of the addition. The appeal of the Revenue and the cross-objection by the assessee were both dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>