https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435068 The Court declined to quash the impugned Panchnama under the Custom Act, 1962, citing the establishment of a cognizable offense against the petitioners. Despite the petitioners' claims of false implication and lawful jewelry operations, the Court found no credible evidence to support their innocence. Consequently, the writ petition seeking relief from harassment and arrest was dismissed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for lacking merit. en-us Fri, 03 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Mar 2023 08:48:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435068 The Court declined to quash the impugned Panchnama under the Custom Act, 1962, citing the establishment of a cognizable offense against the petitioners. Despite the petitioners' claims of false implication and lawful jewelry operations, the Court found no credible evidence to support their innocence. Consequently, the writ petition seeking relief from harassment and arrest was dismissed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for lacking merit. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 03 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435068