<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 447 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435061</link>
    <description>Refusal to refund a pre-deposit made during investigation was held unsustainable where the authority failed to consider the claimant&#039;s request for credit of that deposit under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 and did not afford a proper hearing. The communication did not address the core entitlement issue and the claim was not examined on merits. The High Court quashed the rejection and restored the refund request for fresh consideration after giving the petitioner due opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2023 08:47:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 447 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435061</link>
      <description>Refusal to refund a pre-deposit made during investigation was held unsustainable where the authority failed to consider the claimant&#039;s request for credit of that deposit under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 and did not afford a proper hearing. The communication did not address the core entitlement issue and the claim was not examined on merits. The High Court quashed the rejection and restored the refund request for fresh consideration after giving the petitioner due opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>