<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 62 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32093</link>
    <description>The ruling determined that the applicant&#039;s forward transactions regarding stock qualified as hedging contracts under the Income-tax Act, 1961, in line with Circular No.23D. While the presence of a sales contract is typically required under the Act, the Circular relaxed this condition. Both forward purchase and sale transactions were considered valid hedging activities, not limited to identical goods in stock. The judgment was delivered on May 31, 2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 62 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32093</link>
      <description>The ruling determined that the applicant&#039;s forward transactions regarding stock qualified as hedging contracts under the Income-tax Act, 1961, in line with Circular No.23D. While the presence of a sales contract is typically required under the Act, the Circular relaxed this condition. Both forward purchase and sale transactions were considered valid hedging activities, not limited to identical goods in stock. The judgment was delivered on May 31, 2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>