<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 436 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435050</link>
    <description>Rejection of a remission-related application was found unsustainable where the record showed reversal of CENVAT credit and prior intimation to the department, and that material was not disputed in response. The authority had proceeded on the premise that the reversal was not specifically placed before it, even though it was relevant to the remission claim and already available on the writ record. The matter required fresh consideration of the reversal material, verification of the original records, and an opportunity of hearing before any decision could stand. The rejection was set aside and the matter remanded for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2023 08:46:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 436 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435050</link>
      <description>Rejection of a remission-related application was found unsustainable where the record showed reversal of CENVAT credit and prior intimation to the department, and that material was not disputed in response. The authority had proceeded on the premise that the reversal was not specifically placed before it, even though it was relevant to the remission claim and already available on the writ record. The matter required fresh consideration of the reversal material, verification of the original records, and an opportunity of hearing before any decision could stand. The rejection was set aside and the matter remanded for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>