<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 61 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32092</link>
    <description>The ruling authority held that the institute was required to deduct tax at the source from payments to honorary part-time teachers, based on the established employer-employee relationship between the parties. Tax deduction was deemed applicable under section 192 of the Income Tax Act. The ruling was issued on May 31, 2004, by the Authority for Advance Rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 61 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32092</link>
      <description>The ruling authority held that the institute was required to deduct tax at the source from payments to honorary part-time teachers, based on the established employer-employee relationship between the parties. Tax deduction was deemed applicable under section 192 of the Income Tax Act. The ruling was issued on May 31, 2004, by the Authority for Advance Rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>