<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 113 - HIGH COURT RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32080</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the decisions of the Commissioner and the Tribunal to set aside penalties under Section 271(1)(c). The Court ruled that the voluntary surrender of additional income by the assessee, without evidence of concealment, did not justify imposing penalties. Emphasizing the importance of factual findings in penalty proceedings, the Court cited relevant case laws and precedents to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 113 - HIGH COURT RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32080</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the decisions of the Commissioner and the Tribunal to set aside penalties under Section 271(1)(c). The Court ruled that the voluntary surrender of additional income by the assessee, without evidence of concealment, did not justify imposing penalties. Emphasizing the importance of factual findings in penalty proceedings, the Court cited relevant case laws and precedents to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>