<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 392 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435006</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, overturning the decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to claim a deduction equal to two times the amount of capital expenditure approved by the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (DSIR). Therefore, the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commissioner was deleted, providing relief to the appellant in this matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 392 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435006</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, overturning the decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to claim a deduction equal to two times the amount of capital expenditure approved by the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (DSIR). Therefore, the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commissioner was deleted, providing relief to the appellant in this matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>