https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435000 Territorial jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 depends on the situs of the impugned proceedings and the competent authority, not merely the petitioner's location or bank accounts. Where the challenge concerned ED action under the PMLA, with the predicate FIR registered at Mumbai and the seized material forwarded to Delhi, the Karnataka HC held that it lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ. The availability of an efficacious remedy before the appropriate forum with territorial nexus reinforced that the petition was not maintainable in Karnataka. en-us Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Mar 2023 09:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435000 Territorial jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 depends on the situs of the impugned proceedings and the competent authority, not merely the petitioner's location or bank accounts. Where the challenge concerned ED action under the PMLA, with the predicate FIR registered at Mumbai and the seized material forwarded to Delhi, the Karnataka HC held that it lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ. The availability of an efficacious remedy before the appropriate forum with territorial nexus reinforced that the petition was not maintainable in Karnataka. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435000