<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 384 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434998</link>
    <description>FR 56(j) permits compulsory retirement of a government servant in public interest, but the power must rest on valid material and assessment of the entire service record. Such an order is ordinarily non-punitive and does not attract Article 311(2) unless it carries stigma or serves as a disguised punishment. On the facts, the officer&#039;s long clean record, unsubstantiated complaints, and the proximity of pending disciplinary proceedings showed that the stated public-interest basis was not credible. The Court therefore treated the order as a colourable exercise of power intended to bypass disciplinary action, and held it unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2023 11:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 384 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434998</link>
      <description>FR 56(j) permits compulsory retirement of a government servant in public interest, but the power must rest on valid material and assessment of the entire service record. Such an order is ordinarily non-punitive and does not attract Article 311(2) unless it carries stigma or serves as a disguised punishment. On the facts, the officer&#039;s long clean record, unsubstantiated complaints, and the proximity of pending disciplinary proceedings showed that the stated public-interest basis was not credible. The Court therefore treated the order as a colourable exercise of power intended to bypass disciplinary action, and held it unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>