<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 383 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434997</link>
    <description>Blacklisting and debarment for alleged misstatement of Global Group Revenue were not justified where the record did not show any clear requirement to exclude intra-group sales, nor any deliberate suppression or falsehood. The material suggested at most a possible misunderstanding, and grave civil consequences could not be imposed without a proper show-cause notice and hearing. Because the exclusion of the sister concern from the tender depended entirely on that debarment, the downstream disqualification could not survive once the foundation failed. The tender communications against the sister concern were therefore set aside and the matter restored to the prior tender stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:55:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 383 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434997</link>
      <description>Blacklisting and debarment for alleged misstatement of Global Group Revenue were not justified where the record did not show any clear requirement to exclude intra-group sales, nor any deliberate suppression or falsehood. The material suggested at most a possible misunderstanding, and grave civil consequences could not be imposed without a proper show-cause notice and hearing. Because the exclusion of the sister concern from the tender depended entirely on that debarment, the downstream disqualification could not survive once the foundation failed. The tender communications against the sister concern were therefore set aside and the matter restored to the prior tender stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>