<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (9) TMI 305 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306956</link>
    <description>The Bihar Municipal Corporations Act, 1978 was read as permitting constitution of a municipal corporation by notification where the statutory population condition is satisfied by including adjoining areas that have acquired urban character. The Court treated the inclusion of suburban and Gram Panchayat areas as valid on the materials showing urban development, and held that the Corporation Act operated independently of Panchayat alteration procedures. It further held that no prior notice or hearing was implied for initial constitution of the corporation, Article 21 was not engaged, Article 14 was not breached, and the challenge of mala fides failed for lack of evidence. The notification was upheld as intra vires and not arbitrary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 14:50:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (9) TMI 305 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306956</link>
      <description>The Bihar Municipal Corporations Act, 1978 was read as permitting constitution of a municipal corporation by notification where the statutory population condition is satisfied by including adjoining areas that have acquired urban character. The Court treated the inclusion of suburban and Gram Panchayat areas as valid on the materials showing urban development, and held that the Corporation Act operated independently of Panchayat alteration procedures. It further held that no prior notice or hearing was implied for initial constitution of the corporation, Article 21 was not engaged, Article 14 was not breached, and the challenge of mala fides failed for lack of evidence. The notification was upheld as intra vires and not arbitrary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>