https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306954 The Supreme Court held that the High Court's order reverting the Appellant from Chief Judicial Magistrate to Munsif was unjustified due to initiating a second inquiry on dropped charges, constituting double jeopardy. Additionally, the Court found the High Court's recommendation for compulsory retirement not based on sufficient or relevant material, highlighting discrepancies in the consideration of the Appellant's service record. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeal, set aside the orders, and directed the Appellant to receive all monetary benefits from the date of notional posting as C.J.M. until notional retirement on superannuation. en-us Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Mar 2023 14:13:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306954 The Supreme Court held that the High Court's order reverting the Appellant from Chief Judicial Magistrate to Munsif was unjustified due to initiating a second inquiry on dropped charges, constituting double jeopardy. Additionally, the Court found the High Court's recommendation for compulsory retirement not based on sufficient or relevant material, highlighting discrepancies in the consideration of the Appellant's service record. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeal, set aside the orders, and directed the Appellant to receive all monetary benefits from the date of notional posting as C.J.M. until notional retirement on superannuation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306954