<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 273 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32077</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Assessee on all three issues. The payment made to Riken Piston Rings Inds. Co. Ltd. was considered revenue expenditure, the expenditure on gifts was not categorized as advertisement, and the &#039;Good Work Reward&#039; given to employees was deemed allowable as business expenditure. The court concluded in favor of the Assessee against the Revenue on all counts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 273 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32077</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Assessee on all three issues. The payment made to Riken Piston Rings Inds. Co. Ltd. was considered revenue expenditure, the expenditure on gifts was not categorized as advertisement, and the &#039;Good Work Reward&#039; given to employees was deemed allowable as business expenditure. The court concluded in favor of the Assessee against the Revenue on all counts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>