<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 380 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434994</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 114 for attempted export of prohibited goods without a license. The appellant, a licensed Customs Broker, filed a shipping bill for red sanders without proper authorization, leading to confiscation and penalties. Despite claiming unawareness of the consignment&#039;s contents, the appellant&#039;s negligence in verifying documents and lack of proper authorization rendered them liable for the attempted export. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant&#039;s duty to act diligently as a customs house agent and upheld the penalty, dismissing the appeal based on gross negligence in handling the prohibited goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 08:40:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 380 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434994</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 114 for attempted export of prohibited goods without a license. The appellant, a licensed Customs Broker, filed a shipping bill for red sanders without proper authorization, leading to confiscation and penalties. Despite claiming unawareness of the consignment&#039;s contents, the appellant&#039;s negligence in verifying documents and lack of proper authorization rendered them liable for the attempted export. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant&#039;s duty to act diligently as a customs house agent and upheld the penalty, dismissing the appeal based on gross negligence in handling the prohibited goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>