<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 378 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434992</link>
    <description>A bank account may be restrained during a criminal investigation where it has a direct link to the alleged offence, and a writ court will not interfere on disputed questions of fact or doubtful documentary authenticity without convincing proof. The court found that a stamped counterfoil did not conclusively establish actual presentation of the cheque, and the absence of prompt follow-up weakened the claim. It also noted that the drawer&#039;s account was shown as closed before the alleged presentation and that the cheque formed part of a pending investigation. On those facts, the petitioner failed to make a credible case for writ relief, and the challenge was rejected on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 08:40:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 378 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434992</link>
      <description>A bank account may be restrained during a criminal investigation where it has a direct link to the alleged offence, and a writ court will not interfere on disputed questions of fact or doubtful documentary authenticity without convincing proof. The court found that a stamped counterfoil did not conclusively establish actual presentation of the cheque, and the absence of prompt follow-up weakened the claim. It also noted that the drawer&#039;s account was shown as closed before the alleged presentation and that the cheque formed part of a pending investigation. On those facts, the petitioner failed to make a credible case for writ relief, and the challenge was rejected on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>