https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434984 The court disposed of the writ petition challenging the assessment order for AY 2016-17, granting the petitioner permission to seek correction/rectification from the Assessing Officer within three weeks. The AO must issue a speaking order within eight weeks, considering the petitioner's representation and supporting documents, with a personal hearing. The court clarified its observations would not influence the AO's final decision. Parties were instructed to comply with the digitally signed order, emphasizing corrective action for assessment order discrepancies and partnership firm dissolution. en-us Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Mar 2023 03:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434984 The court disposed of the writ petition challenging the assessment order for AY 2016-17, granting the petitioner permission to seek correction/rectification from the Assessing Officer within three weeks. The AO must issue a speaking order within eight weeks, considering the petitioner's representation and supporting documents, with a personal hearing. The court clarified its observations would not influence the AO's final decision. Parties were instructed to comply with the digitally signed order, emphasizing corrective action for assessment order discrepancies and partnership firm dissolution. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434984