<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 340 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434954</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271AAB(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was concluded that the disallowance under Section 14A was not related to undisclosed income, and the Assessing Officer failed to provide sufficient evidence to justify the penalty. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2023 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 340 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434954</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271AAB(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was concluded that the disallowance under Section 14A was not related to undisclosed income, and the Assessing Officer failed to provide sufficient evidence to justify the penalty. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>