<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 333 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434947</link>
    <description>The court allowed assessment orders post IBC admission but prohibited recovery actions during CIRP, aligning with IBC provisions. It emphasized pursuing statutory appeal instead of challenging orders on merits, recognizing financial constraints during CIRP. The court directed appeal filing within two weeks without pre-deposit requirement to ensure fair access to legal remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 08:36:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 333 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434947</link>
      <description>The court allowed assessment orders post IBC admission but prohibited recovery actions during CIRP, aligning with IBC provisions. It emphasized pursuing statutory appeal instead of challenging orders on merits, recognizing financial constraints during CIRP. The court directed appeal filing within two weeks without pre-deposit requirement to ensure fair access to legal remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>