https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32067 The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's application for restoration of appeal against its order, which had initially been dismissed due to issues with the authorization for filing the appeal. Despite submitting a fresh authorization signed by both required Commissioners after the appeal's dismissal, the Tribunal held that any subsequent authorization filed post-dismissal holds no value, following the precedent set in a previous case. Consequently, the restoration application was deemed devoid of merit and dismissed on 8-2-2008. en-us Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Oct 2019 15:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32067 The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's application for restoration of appeal against its order, which had initially been dismissed due to issues with the authorization for filing the appeal. Despite submitting a fresh authorization signed by both required Commissioners after the appeal's dismissal, the Tribunal held that any subsequent authorization filed post-dismissal holds no value, following the precedent set in a previous case. Consequently, the restoration application was deemed devoid of merit and dismissed on 8-2-2008. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32067