<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 226 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32063</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed on an individual, a &#039;Manpower Recruitment Agency,&#039; for failure to submit ST-3 returns and pay service tax due, citing mental pressure as a defense. The lack of detailed reasoning in the Commissioner&#039;s order led to a remand for a new decision within four months, emphasizing the necessity for quantification and thorough justifications for penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 226 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32063</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed on an individual, a &#039;Manpower Recruitment Agency,&#039; for failure to submit ST-3 returns and pay service tax due, citing mental pressure as a defense. The lack of detailed reasoning in the Commissioner&#039;s order led to a remand for a new decision within four months, emphasizing the necessity for quantification and thorough justifications for penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>