<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 110 - HIGH COURT RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32060</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. The payment of commission at 15% of net sales was deemed justified based on previous case law, emphasizing the reasonableness of expenditure. Additionally, the deduction of bank guarantee commission to directors and relatives for business purposes was permitted, following favorable judgments supporting the assessee&#039;s position. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 110 - HIGH COURT RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32060</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. The payment of commission at 15% of net sales was deemed justified based on previous case law, emphasizing the reasonableness of expenditure. Additionally, the deduction of bank guarantee commission to directors and relatives for business purposes was permitted, following favorable judgments supporting the assessee&#039;s position. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>