<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1698 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306937</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the validity of the Assessing Officer&#039;s order under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2006-07. The Court found that the Assessee had provided sufficient proof of purchases, leading to the conclusion that the order was not erroneous. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed without costs, emphasizing the significance of diligent investigation to ensure the accuracy of tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2023 00:20:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1698 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306937</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the validity of the Assessing Officer&#039;s order under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2006-07. The Court found that the Assessee had provided sufficient proof of purchases, leading to the conclusion that the order was not erroneous. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed without costs, emphasizing the significance of diligent investigation to ensure the accuracy of tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>