<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1384 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306942</link>
    <description>HC set aside penalty imposed under WBGST Act for transporting a vehicle 18 hours after e-way bill expiry. The petitioners successfully argued that a genuine vehicle breakdown caused the delay, with no intention to evade tax. The respondents failed to establish any deliberate tax evasion. The Court ordered a refund of the penalty, subject to compliance with legal formalities, despite respondents&#039; objection regarding alternative remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1384 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306942</link>
      <description>HC set aside penalty imposed under WBGST Act for transporting a vehicle 18 hours after e-way bill expiry. The petitioners successfully argued that a genuine vehicle breakdown caused the delay, with no intention to evade tax. The respondents failed to establish any deliberate tax evasion. The Court ordered a refund of the penalty, subject to compliance with legal formalities, despite respondents&#039; objection regarding alternative remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>